Physical Address
Awka Anambra State
The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has adjourned the high-profile money laundering case involving former Kogi State Governor Yahaya Bello to January 29, 2026, following requests from both the defence and prosecution for more time to prepare their next submissions. The adjournment marks another twist in one of Nigeria’s most closely watched corruption cases, which has continued to stir debate about political accountability and judicial delays.
Justice Emeka Nwite, who presided over the session, announced the new date after listening to submissions from counsels representing the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) and the defendant. The case, which has been in court since early 2024, revolves around allegations that Bello laundered over ₦80 billion during his tenure as governor of Kogi State.
The Adjournment and Court Proceedings
At the resumed hearing on Wednesday, the prosecution team led by Rotimi Oyedepo (SAN) informed the court that certain key witnesses were unavailable, citing logistical and security concerns. He requested additional time to ensure that witnesses could testify without fear of intimidation or interference.
“My Lord, the prosecution remains fully committed to presenting credible witnesses and material evidence to support the case. However, due to circumstances beyond our control, we seek a short adjournment to enable proper coordination,” Oyedepo said.
In response, Bello’s legal team, led by Abdulwahab Mohammed (SAN), did not object to the adjournment but emphasized the need for fairness in the handling of the case. He reiterated that the former governor has consistently maintained his innocence and is ready to defend himself against all charges.
“Our client has nothing to hide. He is prepared to prove that these allegations are baseless and politically motivated,” Mohammed told the court.
Justice Nwite subsequently granted the adjournment, urging both parties to avoid unnecessary delays in future proceedings. He emphasized the importance of ensuring a fair and transparent trial in line with the provisions of Nigerian law.
Background of the Case
The EFCC had in April 2024 filed a multi-count charge against Yahaya Bello, accusing him of diverting state funds and engaging in money laundering while serving as governor from 2016 to 2024. The anti-graft agency alleged that Bello used front companies and associates to move billions of naira through illicit channels, including real estate acquisitions and offshore accounts.
Specifically, the EFCC claimed that Bello orchestrated a web of financial transactions aimed at concealing the origin of state funds, in violation of Sections 15 and 18 of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended).
Bello, however, has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. Through his spokesperson, he has maintained that the charges are part of a “politically motivated witch-hunt” designed to tarnish his reputation following his exit from office.
“These allegations are false, malicious, and politically charged. The former governor served Kogi State with integrity and transparency,” his media aide stated shortly after the initial arraignment.
Public Reactions and Political Implications
The case has generated significant public interest, especially as Yahaya Bello remains a key political figure within the All Progressives Congress (APC). Political observers argue that the outcome of this trial could influence his standing within the party and potentially shape his future political ambitions.
Analysts have also expressed concerns about the pattern of corruption cases involving former state governors that drag on for years without resolution. Some critics argue that judicial delays and procedural bottlenecks often weaken the fight against corruption in Nigeria.
A legal analyst, Barrister Helen Odo, noted that while the EFCC’s efforts are commendable, the prosecution must ensure that cases of this magnitude are handled with diligence and professionalism.
“It’s important that the EFCC presents airtight evidence to avoid the perception that this is another politically driven case. The public is watching, and justice must not only be done but be seen to be done,” Odo said.
Civil society organizations have also called on the judiciary to fast-track corruption-related cases to restore public confidence in Nigeria’s justice system.
EFCC’s Commitment to Justice
The EFCC, in a statement issued after the court session, reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring justice is served, stating that the adjournment would not affect the momentum of the prosecution.
“The Commission remains steadfast in its mission to ensure accountability and transparency. The adjournment is procedural and does not in any way compromise our resolve to prosecute the case diligently,” the statement read.
The agency also appealed to the public for patience, assuring Nigerians that the legal process would be followed meticulously to avoid technical errors that could jeopardize the case.
Yahaya Bello’s Legal Battle So Far
Since leaving office in early 2024, Yahaya Bello has faced multiple legal and political challenges. Apart from the money laundering case, he has been the subject of several petitions filed by anti-corruption watchdogs and civil rights groups. However, this particular trial remains the most significant due to the size of the alleged funds involved.
The former governor’s legal team has filed several preliminary objections, challenging the jurisdiction of the court and the validity of the charges. Although these objections were dismissed by Justice Nwite, they contributed to earlier delays in the proceedings.
Next Steps in the Trial
The case is expected to resume on January 29, 2026, when the court will hear testimonies from key witnesses and examine evidence presented by both sides. Legal experts predict that the trial could extend deep into 2026, depending on the complexity of the evidence and the number of witnesses called to testify.
The court also ordered that all parties refrain from making prejudicial public statements that could influence the case, emphasizing that justice must be allowed to take its full course.
Conclusion
As the nation awaits the continuation of Yahaya Bello’s trial, the case stands as another test of Nigeria’s anti-corruption framework. It raises critical questions about the pace of justice delivery, the influence of politics on prosecution, and the broader fight against financial crimes among public officials.
For now, the adjournment offers both the prosecution and defence a chance to strengthen their cases ahead of what promises to be a defining moment in Nigeria’s judicial history. Whether the former governor will be exonerated or found guilty remains to be seen, but Nigerians are keenly watching for a verdict that upholds justice and accountability.
